Will a Patent on This Wonder-Food Save Lives?

by Te-Ping Chen · 2010-04-09 10:17:00 UTC

When it comes to Plumpy'nut, opinions diverge on whether it's a complex wonder-food or basically just a glorified kind of Nutella. But there's no arguing over its curative properties: the peanut-laden concoction has saved thousands of lives suffering from malnutrition around the world.

So why has the seemingly innocuous foodstuff become — as the BBC puts it — the centerpiece of a "bitter transatlantic legal dispute"?

Globally, there are some 26 million children who face malnutrition every day. Plumpy'nut, a blend of peanut butter, powdered milk, sugar, vegetable oil and vitamins, is a paste that's proven to stave off such hunger, as was well demonstrated during Niger's 2005 food crisis. No problems here.

But the picture gets more complicated once you consider who's battling to manufacture it. On the one hand, you've got Plumpy'nut's French inventors, Nutriset, who at the moment hold a patent on the product. On the other side, you've got two American NGOs who are filing suit to overturn their claim on Plumpy'nut in Washington D.C. federal court, saying that the peanut paste's original manufacturers are stifling access to the life-saving product.

We've seen this narrative before: miracle food/drug gets blocked by greedy insert-company-here. Right?

In this case, though, the picture gets more clouded when you consider that the patent isn't universal, and Nutriset has actually set up a network of partnerships in a dozen countries like Malawi and Kenya to locally manufacture and distribute Plumpy'nut.

The problem, according to Nutriset, is the stringent U.S. requirements that mandate 99% of aid money be spent on American goods. The fear is that if U.S. manufacturers were able to jump into the Plumpy'nut game, they would easily swamp African producers.

That's a well-justified concern, one we've previously blogged about here. It's also one that in Nutriset's case seems undercut by the fact that the company has recently opened up a joint venture in Rhode Island, where it will be able to reap the benefits of U.S. aid preferences (so far, it's gotten $2 million in backing from USAID). Somehow, when it comes to Nutriset's own production, fear about gobbling up African producers doesn't appear quite as salient.

All that aside, though, one of the major issues at hand here isn't just the squabble over who gets to churn out Plumpy'nut — or even the above-mentioned, wildly inefficient U.S. trade preferences. As we've previously touched on here, a bigger question might be the lack of infrastructure and funding to support delivery of such so-called wonder products in the first place.

Photo Credit: master maq

Te-Ping Chen Te-Ping Chen is a freelance writer and U.S. Truman Scholar whose writing has appeared in the Nation Magazine, the South China Morning Post magazine, Le Soir, and Slate.com.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Tiger Woods's Other Indiscretion
NEXT STORY:
A letter from Bettina Siegel, "Pink Slime" petition creator

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.