Will America's $1 Million Investment in Afghan Rugs Boost Child Labor?

by Amanda Kloer · 2010-08-17 14:00:00 UTC
Topics:

After nearly nine years of fighting in Afghanistan, the U.S. military thinks they finally have a solution to the broken economy there: rugs. The Pentagon is poised to invest $1 million in the Afghan carpet and rug industry to create jobs and stimulate the economy. But will they learn from the ongoing battle against child labor and exploitation in the carpet industries in India, Pakistan, and other neighbors and create protections against abuse from the start?

Carpet and rug manufacture in Afghanistan is older than the U.S., and quite frankly, most of the other countries in the world. It's a traditional art steeped in culture, so investing in carpet and rug manufacturing seems like a prudent move to stimulate trade with Afghanistan and boost their economy. However, the carpet industry in Central and East Asia has long been one of the most notorious for child labor, slave labor, and human trafficking. While there have been vast improvements in the industry recently, especially in India, children are still forced to work in the carpet industries in India, Nepal, and Pakistan. The size and dexterity of children's fingers lend themselves to carpet-making easily, making them attractive targets for traffickers looking to get rich off rugs. And unless the Pentagon adds safeguards such as monitoring and reporting requirements to their investment, American taxpayers could end up funding an explosion of child labor in Afghanistan.

The no-bid contract to carry out all this new carpet business is going to a company called Tremayne Consulting, which is based out of New Jersey, literally half a world away from Afghanistan. Tremayne will be in charge of identifying 15 different Afghan suppliers to subcontract the work out to. Those 15 suppliers can, in turn, each subcontract out to as many smaller companies as they like, some of whom can also subcontract. In other words, once Operation Area Rug is up and running, your tax dollars could be invested in the subcontractors of subcontractors of subcontractors of ... you get the picture. That's why oversight is so critically important to projects like this, and why the U.S. government has been frequently criticized for lack of a oversight that allows their subcontractors to enslave people.

Investing in a traditional, local industry to boost the Afghan economy is a great idea, but investing in an industry famous for child labor problems without creating any monitoring or reporting criteria to prevent labor abuses is a recipe for trouble. Hopefully, the Pentagon will learn from the decades of efforts in India and Pakistan and take proactive measures to prevent the children of Afghanistan from suffering the same fate as their easterly neighbors. Because prosperity for the looms of Afghanistan shouldn't come at the cost of its children.

Photo credit: nickallen

Amanda Kloer is a Change.org Editor and has been a full-time abolitionist in several capacities for seven years. Follow her on Twitter @endhumantraffic
PREVIOUS STORY:
Red Light Special: Handmade Woodland Rug
NEXT STORY:
Today is National Human Trafficking Awareness Day, how are you going to take action?

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.