Will Peace Last Without Justice?

by Michelle . · 2009-07-14 16:26:00 UTC
Topics:

Former UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Sudan Dr. Mukesh Kapila has a rather inflammatory piece on the UN Watch website, in which he delivers a bit of a tongue-lashing to the humanitarian community for its opposition to the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.

(Vaguely reminiscent, as you may recall, of a heated debate that recently rumbled through the virtual corridors of Change.org.)

The post, "Seven Excuses for Inaction in Darfur," is at times hostile and prone to oversimplification (granted, it's transcribed from panel remarks and not an exhaustive study), but also makes several very interesting points regarding "progressive revisionism of Darfuri history" and the need to weigh short-term humanitarian interventions against longer-term, more political efforts to address the root causes of such need.

The last section of the post also makes a bold statement about peace and justice:

"This we know from history, from all the examples of every single peace agreement that we can be conscious of over the last years. Not a single peace agreement has ever succeeded unless there has been a foundation addressing the issue of accountability."

Is it true? Have peace agreements historically shown to be unsustainable without provisions for accountability for egregious transgressions of human rights? Can anyone contradict Dr. Kapila and cite an example of a negotiated peace agreement that did not include any sort of accountability measure?

Sounds like the makings of a PhD dissertation. Who's game?

[Photo from AFP: Sudanese women carrying sacks of relief food in Boro Medina, in south Sudan, in 2008.]

Michelle . has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Congolese Army Promises to Stop Raping Congolese Women
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.