Wisconsinites Rally Against Governor's Rejection of Rail Funds

by Zachary Shahan · 2010-12-20 11:00:00 UTC

It has become pretty clear by now that the Republican party has become the "party of No." Can you think of anything the Republican party is actually for, other than tax cuts for the rich?

A few newly-elected Republicans even ran on an anti-high-speed-rail agenda this year. Seriously, what political leader opposes better transportation that creates hundreds of thousands of jobs, improves the economy, and aims to keep the U.S. from being the last country in the developed world without high-speed rail?

Governor-elects Scott Walker of Wisconsin and John Kasich of Ohio carried their anti-rail torches to the finish line this election season, vowing to send over one billion dollars of federal stimulus funds back to Washington. Wisconsin had been awarded $810 million for a 110-mph line connecting Milwaukee and Madison, and Ohio had been awarded $400 million to build a Cincinnati-Columbus-Cleveland route.

The U.S. Department of Transportation wasn't going to sit on the money forever and just last week redirected $1.195 billion from these projects to 13 other states (and to a separate, smaller project in Wisconsin). It didn't take long for the first business to move out of Wisconsin in response. Spanish-owned Talgo Inc., which recently set up shop to build the new trains, announced that it would shut down its manufacturing operations in Wisconsin by 2012 and move most of its operations to one of the states receiving Wisconsin's forfeited money. There go some good jobs for Wisconsin residents, jobs incidentally that Walker said he would be increasing not killing.

Other state leaders, members of the labor group AFL-CIO, and concerned working class citizens have spoken up in response, participating in a rally in the Milwaukee City Hall rotunda sponsored by Citizen Action of Wisconsin (watch the video here and here).

Sheila Cochran, secretary-treasurer of the Milwaukee Area Labor Council, tore into Walker's decision to reject the funding, saying, "I don't know how you declare victory when you turn back $810 million," money that would have helped stimulate thousands of new jobs. "Where in the recesses of his mind does he find a victory in this kind of defeat? His political ambitions have gotten in the way of the job he was elected to do."

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and other elected officials also condemned Walker's decision. "I cannot think of another incidence in the history of this state... where we have ever turned back a competitive grant this large,' said Barrett.

I think it is great these leaders and activists got together and held this rally. The results of this kind of illogical political thinking needs to be brought out into the open.

Why did Walker pull the plug on this great high-speed rail project? Because he didn't want the state government to have to fund operational costs, which would have come to less than a million to a few million dollars a year (note: The state has a $5 billion biennial transportation budget). As one local official at the rally, Nik Kovac, said, Walker's decision was "fiscally insane."

Citizen Action of Wisconsin had been spreading this message as much as it could prior to the election and following Walker's win, calling the move "economic treason," but it and others on its side were unable to keep Walker from canceling the project (which was already under construction). In addition to the rally, a bipartisan group of local communications professionals has gotten business leaders to sign a letter to Walker expressing their frustration and disappointment over this matter, as well as a request for "greater thoughtfulness, civility, creativity and compromise in the future."

In all honesty, I don't think they can expect much of that. Cancelling the high-speed rail project in Wisconsin is actually going to cost the state considerably more than operating the line would have cost it, strictly looking at direct funds (not even considering the jobs and economic growth that were lost).

--

GOT A TIP FOR US? Is there a story or campaign in your area that we'd want to know about? E-mail us at environmenttips@change.org. Please also follow Change.org's Environment page on Facebook and Twitter. Photo credit: swanksalot via flickr

Zachary Shahan has studied society and the environment for years, writes on these issues for a number of blogs, and is now the editor of planetsave.com, ecolocalizer.com, and cleantechnica.com.
PREVIOUS STORY:
South Texas Protesters Stage Sit-In To Demand A Cleaner Future
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.