'World Growth': Masters of Truthiness

by Emily Gertz · 2008-12-07 09:16:00 UTC
Topics:

Remember "World Growth," the group I dug into Friday, after it was featured in a Thursday blog post at The New York Times web site?

The Times covered a newly-released report by World Growth, a report terming it "green global welfare" to compenstate developing nations for preserving their forests as carbon sinks that will help curb on global warming, instead of razing them for agriculture.

Turns out that in addition to promoting disingenous "solutions" to hunger and poverty that would result in chopping down forests for export crops like oil palms, Mr. Oxley and World Growth are also professional global warming deniers.

World Growth apparently backs the web site "Climate Change Issues: Improving understanding in the climate change debate." According to information on the site, it is edited by Steven Macmillan, an employee of Mr. Oxley's firm ITS Global.

Under "Science," the site notes that "Whereas the policy findings of the IPCC [International Panel on Climate Change] depend on political consensus, in the science of climate much remains unknown." This is a true lie, a standard tactic those who have an interest in stalling political and economic action to curb global warming. There's still much to learn about climate and many other phenomena on Earth. But the vast majority of scientists worldwide agree, based on the evidence, that global warming is happening, and that it's caused by human activities.

The value of the information on climatechangeissues.com pretty much flows from that crumbly foundation.

There are dozens if not hundreds of "World Growth" entities out there, defying both reason and logic to promote their agendas. Why make so much about this one group?

First, because it was featured in a blog post at the web site of one of the world's most influential news sources -- giving other journalist/bloggers like myself the opportunity to continue reporting the story.

Second: What's especially damaging about this sort of well-funded and well-distributed truthiness* is that is delays and even undermines the solutions that really need to happen, like: coming up with a successor treaty that really is stronger and more effective than the Kyoto agreement; preparing to protect people and infrastructure from the impacts of global warming that will come no matter what; and transforming our economy -- nationally and globally -- into a steady-state system that doesn't depend on eternal, unmaintainable growth to create prosperity.

Under a guise of prudence and concern about the future, these entities help prevent us from achieving any real safety and security.

* truthiness (noun)
1 : "truth that comes from the gut, not books" (Stephen Colbert, Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report," October 2005)
2 : "the quality of preferring concepts or facts one wishes to be true, rather than concepts or facts known to be true" (American Dialect Society, January 2006)

Source: Merriam-Webster Online

"Truthiness is a term first used in its current satirical sense by American television comedian Stephen Colbert in 2005, to describe things that a person claims to know intuitively or "from the gut" without regard to evidence, logic, intellectual examination, or facts." Source: Wikipedia

PREVIOUS STORY:
The Daily Climate: Fatalistic Friday
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.