Zimbabwe's Inclusive Government Forgot to Include Women

by Jina Moore · 2010-06-23 14:56:00 UTC

A coalition of local human rights NGOs in Zimbabwe, together with the International Center for Transitional Justice, recently put out a fascinating report that surveyed women on a range of issues. The entire report is a must-read, but notable to me were their findings about the country’s “inclusive government” — which, by the way, most respondents seem to feel marginalizes the opposition. In fact, fully 74% of them said Robert Mugabe has all the power in the arrangement.

For example, 70% of women felt that women’s interests were not represented in Zimbabwe's supposedly inclusive government. Another 80% of women declared that their lives had not changed much for the better since the the government was formed. What's more, apart from questions of food security, health and education, a majority of women expressed little trust in the ability of Zimbabwe's "inclusive government" to deliver on a wider range of issues.

And finally, when asked about which political party they favored, 35% of women weren't willing to respond, or said that they don’t actually support any party at all.

In a country where a woman’s — and her husband’s — political views were grounds for rape in pre-election intimidation campaigns, perhaps none of these findings should be very surprising. Although the survey does not interrogate the link between rape campaigns and women’s feelings on politics, the numbers suggest that sexual violence turns out to be a pretty successful way of keeping women from engaging with politics.

Photo Credit: Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Jina Moore is a professional journalist and correspondent for the Christian Science Monitor whose work also appears in Newsweek, The Boston Globe and Best American Science Writing. Read more at http://www.jinamoore.com/.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Which Mommies Matter?
NEXT STORY:
A letter from Bettina Siegel, "Pink Slime" petition creator

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.